VMmark is a free tool used by hardware vendors and others to measure the performance, scalability, and power consumption of virtualization platforms. If you’re unfamiliar with VMmark 3.x, each tile is a grouping of 19 virtual machines (VMs) simultaneously running diverse workloads commonly found in today’s data centers, including a scalable Web simulation, an E-commerce simulation (with backend database VMs), and standby/idle VMs.
As Joshua mentioned in a recent blog post, we released VMmark 3.1 in February, adding support for persistent memory, improving workload scalability, and better reflecting secure customer environments by increasing side-channel vulnerability mitigation requirements.
I’m happy to announce that today we published the first VMmark 3.1 results. These results were obtained on systems meeting our industry-leading side-channel-aware mitigation requirements, thus continuing the benchmark’s ability to provide an indication of real-world performance.
Some mitigations for recently-discovered side-channel vulnerabilities (i.e., Spectre, Meltdown, and L1TF) incur significant performance impacts, while others have little or no impact. Today’s VMmark results demonstrate that even when additional mitigations are in place, ESXi hosts using the new 2nd-Generation Intel® Xeon® Scalable processors obtain higher VMmark scores than comparable 1st-Generation Intel Xeon Scalable processors. This is due to processor design improvements that reduce (or even negate) the performance impact of security mitigations, by mitigating some of the security vulnerabilities in hardware rather than in software.
These results, from Fujitsu, span all three VMmark publication categories:
- Performance Only (9.02 @ 9 tiles)
- Performance with Server Power (6.3290 @ 9 tiles)
- Performance with Server and Storage Power (3.5013 @ 9 tiles)
So, how does this new performance result with Cascade Lake processors compare to the previous generation with Skylake processors? Hopefully a graph is worth a thousand words 😊…
As you can see, Fujitsu was able to achieve a higher score, while being able to run an additional tile (19 more VMs) and still meeting strict Quality-of-Service (QoS) compliance requirements imposed by the VMmark benchmark harness.
Industry-Leading Side-Channel Mitigation Requirements
Given the numerous security vulnerabilities recently identified, we set a high bar in VMmark 3.1 that requires all applicable security mitigations in benchmarked environments to best represent secure, real-world customer environments.
These are the current security mitigation requirements for VMmark 3.1:
Note: If “N/A” is listed, that vulnerability does not apply to that portion of the stack.
For more information about VMmark, please visit the VMmark product page.
If you have any questions or feedback, please leave us a comment below. Thanks!
One comment has been added so far