Home > Blogs > VMware VROOM! Blog


VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN (VSAN)

VMware vSphere® 5.5 introduces the beta availability of VMware® Virtual SAN (VSAN). This feature allows a new software-defined storage tier, pools compute and direct-attached storage resources, and clusters server disks and flash to create resilient shared storage.

This blog showcases Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) performance on Virtual SAN using VMware View Planner, which is designed to simulate a large-scale deployment of virtualized desktop systems. This is achieved by generating a workload representative of many user-initiated operations that take place in a typical VDI environment. The results allow us to study the effects on an entire virtualized infrastructure including the storage subsystem. View Planner can be downloaded here.

In this blog, we evaluate the performance of VSAN using View Planner with different VSAN node configurations. In this experiment, we build a 3-node VSAN cluster and a 7-node VSAN cluster to determine the maximum number of VDI virtual machines (VMs) we can run while meeting the quality of service (QoS) criteria set for View Planner.  The maximum number of passing VMs is called the VDImark™ for a given system under test. This metric is used for VDI benchmarking and it encapsulates the number of VDI users that can be run on a given system with an application response time less than the set threshold. For response time characterization, View Planner operations are divided into three main groups: (1) Group A for interactive operations, (2) Group B for I/O operations, and (3) Group C for background operations. The score is determined separately for Group A user operations and Group B user operations by calculating the 95th percentile latency of all the operations in a group. The default thresholds are 1.0 second for Group A and 6.0 seconds for Group B. Please refer to the user guide, and the run and reporting guides for more details. Hence, the scoring is based on several factors such as the response time of the operations, compliance of the setup and configurations, and so on.

Experimental Setup

The host running the desktop VMs has 16 Intel Xeon E5-2690 cores running @ 2.9GHz. The host has 256GB physical RAM, which is more than sufficient to run 100 1GB Windows 7 VMs. For VSAN, each host has two disk groups where each disk group has one PCI-e solid-state drive (SSD) of 200GB and six 300GB 15k RPM SAS disks.

View Planner QoS (VDImark)

The View Planner benchmark was run to find the VDImark for both 3-node and 7-node VSAN clusters and the results are shown in the chart above. In the 3-node cluster, a VDImark of 286 was achieved and for 7-node cluster, a VDImark score of 677 was achieved. So, there is nice scaling in terms of maximum VMs supported as the numbers of nodes were increased in VSAN from 3 to 7.

To further illustrate the Group A and Group B response times, we show the average response time of individual operations for these runs for both Group A and Group B, as follows.

Group A Response Times

As seen in the figure above, the average response times of the most interactive operations are less than one second, which is needed to provide good end-user experience. If we look at the 3-node and 7-node run, we don’t see much variance in the response times, and they almost remain constant when scaling up. This clearly illustrates that, as we scale the number of VMs in larger nodes of a VSAN cluster, the user experience doesn’t degrade and scales nicely.

Group B Response Times

Since Group B is more sensitive to I/O and CPU usage, the above chart for Group B operations is more important to see how we scale. It is evident from the chart that there is not much difference in the response times as the number of VMs were increased from 286 VMs on a 3-node cluster to 677 VMs on a 7-node cluster. Hence, storage-sensitive VDI operations also scale well as we scale the VSAN nodes from 3 to 7.

To see other parts on the VDI/VSAN benchmarking blog series, check the links below:
VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN – Part 1
VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN – Part 2
VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN – Part 3

16 thoughts on “VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN (VSAN)

  1. Pingback: Virtual SAN & support for Horizon View Desktops | VMware vSphere Blog - VMware Blogs

  2. Pingback: Welcome to vSphere-land! » vSphere 5.5 Link-O-Rama

  3. Tony Holland

    Do you have the guest latency statistics to go along with these runs? I have used view planner and have 1000ms in guest latency and still had tests pass the view planner run. Banit had even confirmed that storage latency was not considered in View planner scoring.

    Thanks,
    Tony

    Reply
  4. Banit

    When you say persistent, did you mean full clones? We have collected some results on full clone VMs on VSAN and will have a separate blog on that.

    Tony, These runs were with View Planner 3.0 which takes into account both Group A (interactive) and Group B (strorage/cpu sensitive). So, any increase in guest latency (> 20 msec) will significantly affect the group B score and ultimately the final VDImark.

    Reply
  5. Pingback: Horizon View 5.3 Storage Optimization Features–Deep Dive | VMware End-User Computing Blog - VMware Blogs

  6. Pingback: VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN – Part 2 | VMware VROOM! Blog - VMware Blogs

  7. Pingback: VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN – Part 3 | VMware VROOM! Blog - VMware Blogs

  8. Pingback: VDI Benchmarking Using View Planner on VMware Virtual SAN (VSAN) | VMware VROOM! Blog - VMware Blogs

  9. Pingback: Virtual SAN & Horizon View Performance Benchmarks Blog Series | VMware vSphere Blog - VMware Blogs

  10. Pingback: Virtual SAN & Horizon View Performance Benchmarks Blog Series - Punching Clouds

  11. Vaughn Stewart

    Historically speaking, delivering VDI performance is a challenge. There’s a number of new architectures that leverage flash to address the unique price/performance requirements.. The market has standardized on VDI benchmark testing with LoginVSI. I would ask that VMware publish View on VSAN results so the market can clearly understand where VSAN performs well when compared to the market.

    See: http://www.loginvsi.com/download/white-papers

    Reply
  12. Pingback: Welcome to vSphere-land! » VSAN Links

  13. Pingback: Consolidated list of all Virtual SAN (VSAN) deep dive resources. |

  14. Pingback: Official VMware Virtual SAN Blog Index | VMware vSphere Blog - VMware Blogs

  15. Pingback: Official VMware Virtual Blog Index - Punching Clouds

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>