VMware

Interview: VMware ESX Server in the Enterprise author Edward Haletky | Main | I did my part by reading about virtualization in a trade journal

February 11, 2008

Scalable Storage Performance with VMware ESX Server 3.5 - VMware VROOM!

Link: Scalable Storage Performance with VMware ESX Server 3.5 - VMware VROOM!.

It is clear from Figure 1 that except for sequential read there is no drop in aggregate throughput as we scale the number of hosts. The reason sequential read drops is that the sequential streams coming in from different ESX Server hosts are no longer sequential when intermixed at the storage array, and thus become random. Writes generally do better than reads because they are absorbed by the write cache and flushed to disks in the background.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c328153ef00e550419bbd8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Scalable Storage Performance with VMware ESX Server 3.5 - VMware VROOM!:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

About VMTN Blog

  • VMTN Blog brings you the news from VMware and the greater VMware community and blogosphere. Read all VMware Blogs. For the full virtualization conversation, go to Planet V12n.

Subscribe

Roundtable Podcast

Twitter Chatter